The proof-lane view shows which packets are reusable now, which need refresh work, and where ownership or evidence depth is still slowing the board, investor, or buyer packet.
Each packet keeps one owner, one audience, one proof theme, and one next action attached so proof work does not disappear into ad hoc follow-up.
Question: Can we point a buyer at one spec suite plus signing-key URL plus audit-stream and answer the procurement question without bespoke prep?
Gap: Public adoption telemetry (who-uses-it) is thinner than the spec depth itself — Pulse fills part of this; vendor adoption badges are still missing.
Ship vendor-adoption badges + spec-use scorecard sourced from procurement-pulse-engine universe.csv
Question: Can we hand a buyer a public, signed measurement of the industry instead of self-report claims?
Gap: Per-vertical sub-issues would compound buyer signal — currently a single combined report per quarter.
Draft an interim between-issues spotlight for one vertical (HealthTech or FinTech) using the existing summarizer.
Question: Can a CFO or CRO open one of these surfaces and answer their operator question without a custom build?
Gap: Net-new lane after archiving 10 exec-family duplicates — buyer signal not yet collected for which of the 4 has highest pull-through.
Add lightweight per-surface usage analytics + a single contact path; let buyer choice show.
Question: Can a regulated-industry reviewer see vertical depth plus readiness language posture without us tripping over compliance vocabulary?
Gap: No HealthTech buyer in the pipeline yet — surfaces are show-don't-tell evidence rather than active sales tools.
Draft a per-vertical HealthTech Pulse Issue to surface measurement of the broader sector beyond just our 8 surfaces.
Question: Can we show a martech / growth-ops buyer a coherent consent + experimentation + tokenization + attribution lane without a 6-month integration project?
Gap: identity-risk-evidence-ledger CI broken (eslint peer-dep, issue #11 filed) — blocks v1.0-prod hardening of one anchor repo.
When Codex pushes CI fix, harden identity-risk-evidence-ledger; meanwhile draft a Pulse Klaviyo-vertical spotlight.
Question: Can a buyer risk team use a free public toolkit to draft AI System Cards, evidence packs, vendor intake, tabletop exercises, and risk registers without signing up for anything?
Gap: Per-tool usage analytics not present — choosing which to deepen next is currently guesswork.
Add minimal client-side counter (no server) + GSC submission for /trust/ subpages to surface usage signal.
Question: Can we run our own diligence response through our own four surfaces and surface the proof gaps that close before a buyer asks?
Gap: Subdomain SSL first-time-provisioning lag (auto-resolves in 24h); per-surface analytics not yet wired.
Wait for SSL provisioning; then exercise full diligence-response cycle on a sample RFP to harden the end-to-end flow.
Question: Can a SaaS embedder ship hash-chained + vault-contracted + ed25519-signable customer-data audit in three lines of code?
Gap: Not on npm registry yet — README updated to disclose publish-pending state and provide github: install fallback; commercial launch blocked on EIN, bank, Stripe, invoice infrastructure.
Land NPM_TOKEN secret + first npm publish (Miz escalation); meanwhile harden Procurement Packet Starter into a buyer-ready PDF.